We are ready to represent the best custom paper writing assistance that can cope with any task like From An Elaborate Exaggeration To A Natural Integration: Arguing Against the Decision of the Plessy Court even at the eleventh hour. The matter is that we posses the greatest base of expert writers. Our staff of freelance writers includes approximately 300 experienced writers are at your disposal all year round. They are striving to provide the best ever services to the most desperate students that have already lost the hope for academic success. We offer the range of the most widely required, however, not recommended for college use papers. It is advisable to use our examples like From An Elaborate Exaggeration To A Natural Integration: Arguing Against the Decision of the Plessy Court in learning at public-education level. Get prepared and be smart with our best essay samples cheap and fast! Get in touch and we will write excellent custom coursework or essay especially for you.
From An Elaborate Exaggeration To A Natural Integration
Arguing Against the Decision of the Plessy Court
“It is one thing for railroad carriers to furnish, or to be required by law to furnish, equal accommodations for all whom they are under a legal duty to carry. It is quite another thing for government to forbid citizens of the white and black races from traveling in the same public conveyance, and to punish officers of railroad companies for permitting persons of the two races to occupy the same passenger coach. If a state can prescribe, as a rule of civil conduct, that whites and blacks shall not travel as passengers in the same railroad coach, why may it not so regulate the use of the streets of its cities and towns as to compel white citizens to keep on one side of a street, and black citizens to keep on the other? Why may it not, upon like grounds, punish whites and blacks that ride together in streetcars or in open vehicles on a public road or street? Why may it not require sheriffs to assign whites to one side of a courtroom, and blacks to the other? And why may it not also prohibit the commingling of the two races in the galleries of legislative halls or in public assemblages convened for the consideration of the political questions of the day? Further, if this statute of Louisiana is consistent with the personal liberty of citizens, why may not the state require the separation in railroad coaches of native and naturalized citizens of the United States, or of Protestants and Roman Catholics?”
This passage of Justice Harlan’s dissent in the Plessy vs. Ferguson case contains an argument against the majority decision of the Supreme Court to uphold separate accommodations for blacks and whites. While Harlan is correct in disagreeing with the decision, he does not make a very good argument. He attempts to create a logical flow between several different situations in which blacks and whites could have the same accommodations, but fails miserably. He also attempts to appeal to the emotions of the court, but exaggerates so much that he fails in this way as well. A better strategy for Harlan would have been to describe how blacks and whites naturally want to have equal accommodations and to commingle in every area of society.
Harlan’s argument is structured around the idea that blacks and whites should be equal before the law and that segregation in railroad cars ascribes inferiority to blacks. This premise is not explicitly stated; he does not come out and say that blacks and whites should be equal. He begins his argument with the decision of the court to uphold the law then lists several possible segregations, that he believes come as natural proceeding steps after the decision, with a rhetorical tone that implies outrage at the notion of blacks being inferior to whites. He sets up a situation and attempts to work through a logical progression in order to arrive at his conclusion. But along the way he becomes illogical. For example, he states that “If a state can prescribe, as a rule of civil conduct, that whites and blacks shall not travel as passengers in the same railroad coach, why may it not so regulate the use of the streets of its cities and towns as to compel white citizens to keep on one side of a street, and black citizens to keep on the other?” This sentence shows that he can begin with one situation, whites and blacks traveling in a train, and illogically jump to a separate situation, whites and blacks walking along the street, without using appropriate intermediate claims to transition between the two.
Harlan’s rhetorical tone not only fails to make a logical argument by incorrectly using logos, but also fails to make an emotional argument by misusing pathos. Appealing to the emotions of a targeted audience can be an effective rhetorical strategy when used well, but Harlan is guilty of a logical fallacy by over appealing to emotion, which encourages skepticism. This is evident in his intermediate claims in which he lists several scenarios where blacks would be unequal to whites. For instance, he interprets the law to provide a possibility for sheriffs to “assign whites to one side of a courtroom, and blacks to the other” and for the races to be prohibited from commingling in all areas of life. He describes these scenarios in a progressively drastic manner, ending the passage with a reference to religious discrimination. This portion of his argument is weak. First of all, he provides so many different scenarios that he is clearly exaggerating. Also, in the last line of the quoted passage he goes from describing racial discrimination to discussing the possibility of religious discrimination. By taking such a detour from the issue at hand he is missing the point. This fallacy is evident in the exaggerated way he starts off attacking racism then concludes by attacking a totally different type of discrimination. He commits another fallacy by saying that either the races should not be segregated at all, or they will be segregated always. Certainly there could be some situations where they could be discriminated and somewhere they could not be. He is wrong in asserting that segregation is an all or nothing principle because it may be more prevalent on trains, but not as rampant in courthouses or on street corners. While these fallacies are prominent in Harlan’s argument, there are some portions of his dissent that are very strong.
A major strength in Harlan’s argument is his inclusion of figures such as the sheriff who must force the races to separate. The presence of the sheriff who has the power to “assign whites to one side of a courtroom, and blacks to the other” shows how Harlan believed that blacks and whites want to exist together and would have to be forced to separate. It is discriminatory to prevent blacks and whites from riding together; the two races should be allowed to commingle because they naturally desire to. If this were not true then sheriffs and others would not be needed to force blacks and whites apart, they would naturally separate. Furthermore, blacks and whites not only want to commingle, they want be equal under the law and have equal accommodations. If this were not true then Homer Plessy and other blacks would not have challenged the law keeping them segregated on trains. Also, blacks and whites need to be equally integrated because they can work together to improve society. Plato believed that society arose as a way for people to have their needs met by others. Blacks and whites can work together to invent new things and make the culture more diverse.
Although, it could be said that blacks and whites do not have a natural desire to integrate due to the animosity whites feel towards blacks, especially in the South where groups like the KKK sometimes violently oppose the mere existence of black people. This attitude arose out of a necessity for some whites to dominate their black slaves in order to keep the slaves working and to prevent insurrection. This mindset existed for so long that eventually white slave owners began to truly hate blacks. But the whites needed the blacks to work as slaves on their plantations in order to increase crop yields and keep the whites from working too extensively. This domination of blacks only came about when some people decided that black prisoners could be used as slaves. It did not exist throughout the thousands of years prior to the 1th century. Therefore, blacks and whites do, indeed, want to be equal; some whites resist only because they inherit it from an attitude of their ancestors who simply needed a method to keep black slaves in line.
Justice Harlan’s dissent was so exaggerated that it was unsuccessful in changing any of the minds of the other Supreme Court justices. Harlan failed to make either a logical or emotional argument. But that does not change the fact that the Supreme Court should have acknowledged human nature and allowed blacks and whites to commingle and have equal accommodations.
Mind that the sample papers like From An Elaborate Exaggeration To A Natural Integration: Arguing Against the Decision of the Plessy Court presented are to be used for review only. In order to warn you and eliminate any plagiarism writing intentions, it is highly recommended not to use the essays in class. In cases you experience difficulties with essay writing in class and for in class use, order original papers with our expert writers. Cheap custom papers can be written from scratch for each customer that entrusts his or her academic success to our writing team. Order your unique assignment from the best custom writing services cheap and fast!
Saturday, April 27, 2013
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Is the yellow wallpaper a feminist work?
We are ready to represent the best custom paper writing assistance that can cope with any task like Is the yellow wallpaper a feminist work? even at the eleventh hour. The matter is that we posses the greatest base of expert writers. Our staff of freelance writers includes approximately 300 experienced writers are at your disposal all year round. They are striving to provide the best ever services to the most desperate students that have already lost the hope for academic success. We offer the range of the most widely required, however, not recommended for college use papers. It is advisable to use our examples like Is the yellow wallpaper a feminist work? in learning at public-education level. Get prepared and be smart with our best essay samples cheap and fast! Get in touch and we will write excellent custom coursework or essay especially for you.
In the story “The Yellow Wallpaper” written by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, there is a strong sense of a feminist view. A young married woman suffers from a “disease” the her doctor husband John tries to cure her from when in fact the presence of his superiority and knowledge leads her to hide her feelings and ultimately become more sick. This short story is a perfect example of the struggle of a young woman in a complicated circumstance.
The bedroom of the house that this couple has just moved into is decorated with terrible yellow wallpaper and this is one of the driving forces behind her “hysterical actions.” She sees a woman, behind the hideous patterns and it turns out that she is the woman trying to break free of the patterns. Her husband denies her request to change the wallpaper and that is a perfect example of her repressed feelings, the feelings that if expressed, might cure her. Deep down she writes on her paper and tells her true feelings about how she is to trust and obey her all knowing husband. She knows he loves her and earnestly believes he is trying to help, but the only way he thinks she can get better is if she does the things he thinks will help her and that is just the thing that keeps her sick.
There are many examples of male dominance in this story and there also is the underlying tone of that being the “bad” thing. Her husband John says things like “What is it little girl, don’t go walking around like that, you’ll get cold” and “Bless her little heart” (yes that is in the third person). He treats her as if she were a child who could not think for herself. On another note, writing is one of the things that help her a great deal and John hates her to write because he says it exhausts her. Again, just because he “knows” what is good for her he shuns her needs, which are the very things that could make her well again.
The woman in the story is clearly made out to be the inferior character; however this is the reason for her struggle with the yellow wallpaper in her bedroom. Her wellness depends on ripping that disgusting wallpaper down and John believes one should not give into “such fancies as that.” She finally loses it and locks herself into the room to free the woman trapped in the paper. The author does a wonderful job of depicting a woman’s struggle and victory on her own when she pretends like she is obeying what her husband asks of her.
This story was written in a time where the feminist movement was very prevalent. The way that Gilman relates the woman’s sickness to her husband’s dominance is a perfect example of a feminist thought. In answer to the question yes, the Yellow Wallpaper is an extremely feminist work, in a beautiful and frustrating way. As I stated, it is an example of struggle that was a victory in a way because she tore down the wallpaper but a failure because she was still sick. Ultimately, leaving one to think about the bittersweet, trials and tribulations of women in that time period.
Mind that the sample papers like Is the yellow wallpaper a feminist work? presented are to be used for review only. In order to warn you and eliminate any plagiarism writing intentions, it is highly recommended not to use the essays in class. In cases you experience difficulties with essay writing in class and for in class use, order original papers with our expert writers. Cheap custom papers can be written from scratch for each customer that entrusts his or her academic success to our writing team. Order your unique assignment from the best custom writing services cheap and fast!
In the story “The Yellow Wallpaper” written by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, there is a strong sense of a feminist view. A young married woman suffers from a “disease” the her doctor husband John tries to cure her from when in fact the presence of his superiority and knowledge leads her to hide her feelings and ultimately become more sick. This short story is a perfect example of the struggle of a young woman in a complicated circumstance.
The bedroom of the house that this couple has just moved into is decorated with terrible yellow wallpaper and this is one of the driving forces behind her “hysterical actions.” She sees a woman, behind the hideous patterns and it turns out that she is the woman trying to break free of the patterns. Her husband denies her request to change the wallpaper and that is a perfect example of her repressed feelings, the feelings that if expressed, might cure her. Deep down she writes on her paper and tells her true feelings about how she is to trust and obey her all knowing husband. She knows he loves her and earnestly believes he is trying to help, but the only way he thinks she can get better is if she does the things he thinks will help her and that is just the thing that keeps her sick.
There are many examples of male dominance in this story and there also is the underlying tone of that being the “bad” thing. Her husband John says things like “What is it little girl, don’t go walking around like that, you’ll get cold” and “Bless her little heart” (yes that is in the third person). He treats her as if she were a child who could not think for herself. On another note, writing is one of the things that help her a great deal and John hates her to write because he says it exhausts her. Again, just because he “knows” what is good for her he shuns her needs, which are the very things that could make her well again.
The woman in the story is clearly made out to be the inferior character; however this is the reason for her struggle with the yellow wallpaper in her bedroom. Her wellness depends on ripping that disgusting wallpaper down and John believes one should not give into “such fancies as that.” She finally loses it and locks herself into the room to free the woman trapped in the paper. The author does a wonderful job of depicting a woman’s struggle and victory on her own when she pretends like she is obeying what her husband asks of her.
This story was written in a time where the feminist movement was very prevalent. The way that Gilman relates the woman’s sickness to her husband’s dominance is a perfect example of a feminist thought. In answer to the question yes, the Yellow Wallpaper is an extremely feminist work, in a beautiful and frustrating way. As I stated, it is an example of struggle that was a victory in a way because she tore down the wallpaper but a failure because she was still sick. Ultimately, leaving one to think about the bittersweet, trials and tribulations of women in that time period.
Mind that the sample papers like Is the yellow wallpaper a feminist work? presented are to be used for review only. In order to warn you and eliminate any plagiarism writing intentions, it is highly recommended not to use the essays in class. In cases you experience difficulties with essay writing in class and for in class use, order original papers with our expert writers. Cheap custom papers can be written from scratch for each customer that entrusts his or her academic success to our writing team. Order your unique assignment from the best custom writing services cheap and fast!
Sunday, April 14, 2013
Hamlet
We are ready to represent the best custom paper writing assistance that can cope with any task like Hamlet even at the eleventh hour. The matter is that we posses the greatest base of expert writers. Our staff of freelance writers includes approximately 300 experienced writers are at your disposal all year round. They are striving to provide the best ever services to the most desperate students that have already lost the hope for academic success. We offer the range of the most widely required, however, not recommended for college use papers. It is advisable to use our examples like Hamlet in learning at public-education level. Get prepared and be smart with our best essay samples cheap and fast! Get in touch and we will write excellent custom coursework or essay especially for you.
Hamlet by William Shakespeare
Task Characterization of Claudius.
Claudius, a character who reflects the story of Cane and Able.
This man has a troubled conscience. When he gazes at Gertrude, he genuinely feel love. However, when he looks away from her, he remembers how she became a widow and how he never told her the hideous crime he committed. When he speaks with her, Claudius will sound soft and compassionate, as if he were apologizing to her without saying the words. His temper will never flare up with Gertrude; instead, whenever he feels angry, he will look at Gertrude for a comforting face. I recommend that he should tenderly touch Gertrude often to show that he truly does care about her.Although Claudius would sell his soul to the devil to make Gertrude happy, he does not care at all for Ophelia. He uses her simply as a tool for ridding himself of Hamlet. He will talk to Ophelia in a stern voice with forced tolerance rather than compassion. Claudius temper will not flare up against Ophelia because he needs her assistance; however, he will lose his patience once in a while. He will yield smiles of pretense to her, and talk to her as if she had the understanding of a child. Later on in the scene, his pat on her shoulder will be a heartless gesture; he will feel as if he is praising a dog after doing a trick. Claudius has no sympathy for Ophelia, nor Polonius her father. However, unlike his attitude towards Ophelia, Claudius has respect and admiration for his advisor. Claudius will take Polonius wisely without argument, though the king should roll his eyes once in a while at Polonius long-winded remarks. Claudius will listen attentively to every word that Polonius says, which is why Claudius will be noticeably shocked when Polonius whispers We do sugar o’erthe Devil himself. However, Claudius respects every word that comes out of Polonius mouth perhaps a little too much. Claudius has become jealous of Polonius wisdom and gives the occasional false I know that nod while Polonius is trying to make a point. One thing to note is that Claudius will not make eye contact with Polonius; in a sense, Claudius does not want his eyes to reveal anything to the eavesdropping Polonius. Claudius is definitely a man of secrets and does not trust in Polonius promises.Claudius wields much respect for Polonius; however, he has none for Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. He views the two as slaves and will address them with insensitivity. He does not care about their feelings. He does not care what happens to them after Hamlet is dead. Claudius simply plans to pay them for their work, and never see them again. He wants to be seen as the employer, so he will harshly treat them as lowly employees. He will often get angry at their incompetence and will keep his chin high while facing them. He has no intention of socializing with underlings. Lastly, though Claudius never does speak with Hamlet, the two will have a huge impact on each other. Claudius will squirm with uneasiness whenever Hamlet seems to look at him through his fathers portrait. The king fears that Hamlet knows the truth about King Hamlets death and will therefore take every one of Hamlets words seriously. Claudius will even cover his mouth a few times in fear when Hamlet mentions images of death and decay. Claudius has never trusted Hamlet, and would kill him on the spot if it were guaranteed that Gertrude would never find out. However, in the world of Shakespeare, two successful murders out of two is a little uncommon…
Mind that the sample papers like Hamlet presented are to be used for review only. In order to warn you and eliminate any plagiarism writing intentions, it is highly recommended not to use the essays in class. In cases you experience difficulties with essay writing in class and for in class use, order original papers with our expert writers. Cheap custom papers can be written from scratch for each customer that entrusts his or her academic success to our writing team. Order your unique assignment from the best custom writing services cheap and fast!
Hamlet by William Shakespeare
Task Characterization of Claudius.
Claudius, a character who reflects the story of Cane and Able.
This man has a troubled conscience. When he gazes at Gertrude, he genuinely feel love. However, when he looks away from her, he remembers how she became a widow and how he never told her the hideous crime he committed. When he speaks with her, Claudius will sound soft and compassionate, as if he were apologizing to her without saying the words. His temper will never flare up with Gertrude; instead, whenever he feels angry, he will look at Gertrude for a comforting face. I recommend that he should tenderly touch Gertrude often to show that he truly does care about her.Although Claudius would sell his soul to the devil to make Gertrude happy, he does not care at all for Ophelia. He uses her simply as a tool for ridding himself of Hamlet. He will talk to Ophelia in a stern voice with forced tolerance rather than compassion. Claudius temper will not flare up against Ophelia because he needs her assistance; however, he will lose his patience once in a while. He will yield smiles of pretense to her, and talk to her as if she had the understanding of a child. Later on in the scene, his pat on her shoulder will be a heartless gesture; he will feel as if he is praising a dog after doing a trick. Claudius has no sympathy for Ophelia, nor Polonius her father. However, unlike his attitude towards Ophelia, Claudius has respect and admiration for his advisor. Claudius will take Polonius wisely without argument, though the king should roll his eyes once in a while at Polonius long-winded remarks. Claudius will listen attentively to every word that Polonius says, which is why Claudius will be noticeably shocked when Polonius whispers We do sugar o’erthe Devil himself. However, Claudius respects every word that comes out of Polonius mouth perhaps a little too much. Claudius has become jealous of Polonius wisdom and gives the occasional false I know that nod while Polonius is trying to make a point. One thing to note is that Claudius will not make eye contact with Polonius; in a sense, Claudius does not want his eyes to reveal anything to the eavesdropping Polonius. Claudius is definitely a man of secrets and does not trust in Polonius promises.Claudius wields much respect for Polonius; however, he has none for Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. He views the two as slaves and will address them with insensitivity. He does not care about their feelings. He does not care what happens to them after Hamlet is dead. Claudius simply plans to pay them for their work, and never see them again. He wants to be seen as the employer, so he will harshly treat them as lowly employees. He will often get angry at their incompetence and will keep his chin high while facing them. He has no intention of socializing with underlings. Lastly, though Claudius never does speak with Hamlet, the two will have a huge impact on each other. Claudius will squirm with uneasiness whenever Hamlet seems to look at him through his fathers portrait. The king fears that Hamlet knows the truth about King Hamlets death and will therefore take every one of Hamlets words seriously. Claudius will even cover his mouth a few times in fear when Hamlet mentions images of death and decay. Claudius has never trusted Hamlet, and would kill him on the spot if it were guaranteed that Gertrude would never find out. However, in the world of Shakespeare, two successful murders out of two is a little uncommon…
Mind that the sample papers like Hamlet presented are to be used for review only. In order to warn you and eliminate any plagiarism writing intentions, it is highly recommended not to use the essays in class. In cases you experience difficulties with essay writing in class and for in class use, order original papers with our expert writers. Cheap custom papers can be written from scratch for each customer that entrusts his or her academic success to our writing team. Order your unique assignment from the best custom writing services cheap and fast!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)